the Symbolic, the Visual, the Recursive

This is an assignment from 4.580:Inquiry into Computation and Design by Prof. Terry Knight. We were supposed to parse a design into rules that could be passed on and used to regenerate it.

We took Le Corbusier’s plan of Maison Citrohan (1927). It was crucial to which detail one chose to represent the design. We realized that by just extracting out elements from the plans, shape grammar would be very symbolic and become a shopping catalog. The recursive function and flexibility was a must in order to develop a true design tool. We ended up with a Corb automator with recursive functions but also one symbolic architecture element introduced (the stair).

In class discussion it was left an open question whether the nature of architecture is symbolic, but it seemed unlikely that limited rules can describe everything in design.

Collaborator: Joseph Choma, Siobhan Rockcastle
Tools used: Processing

Advertisements

Tags: , ,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: